Free Essays on The Case for Greatly Increased Immigration Vrs Timeout

Contrasing Two Essays In the argumentative essay â€Å"The Case for Greatly Increased Immigration† written by Julian L. Stein and also the essay â€Å"Timeout† written by Dan Stein, they are both trying to convince the audience to take their side. Stein and Simon both have different views on the subject of immigration, Simon wants the immigration rate to be increased and on the other hand, Stein wants to stop it all together until the issues are under control. Not only does Simon have evidence to justify his facts, but he also uses a number of reasons and explanations. Although Stein has some strong points, he seems to use his facts in negative ways. Simon’s essay seems to be more effective in persuading the audience to increase immigration. A strong point that makes Simon’s essay more effective than Stein’s, is that almost every one of his statements and facts are backed up by some sort of evidence. In both of the essays they talk about the number of immigrants that arrived in the U.S. in 1991. Simon said that there were about 600,00 to 750,000 admitted in that year (457). Simon also states where he got these numbers. On the other hand, in Stein’s essay he claims there were over 1,800,000 immigrants admitted to the U.S. in 1991(469). Not only was that number more than two times the number Simon gave, but also Stein does not even explain where or how he got the numbers, which makes his facts less effective. Another point, that would make Simon’s essay more effective would be the statements that he makes in letting the audience know of the ways the natives can benefit by admitting a certain number of immigrants in. Not only is he just stating the reasons, he is explaining them in detail and using examples to make them more convincing to the reader. One statement Simon’ makes is that immigration would actually save the native money: The tax and welfare data together indicate that, on balance, an immigrant famil... Free Essays on The Case for Greatly Increased Immigration Vrs Timeout Free Essays on The Case for Greatly Increased Immigration Vrs Timeout Contrasing Two Essays In the argumentative essay â€Å"The Case for Greatly Increased Immigration† written by Julian L. Stein and also the essay â€Å"Timeout† written by Dan Stein, they are both trying to convince the audience to take their side. Stein and Simon both have different views on the subject of immigration, Simon wants the immigration rate to be increased and on the other hand, Stein wants to stop it all together until the issues are under control. Not only does Simon have evidence to justify his facts, but he also uses a number of reasons and explanations. Although Stein has some strong points, he seems to use his facts in negative ways. Simon’s essay seems to be more effective in persuading the audience to increase immigration. A strong point that makes Simon’s essay more effective than Stein’s, is that almost every one of his statements and facts are backed up by some sort of evidence. In both of the essays they talk about the number of immigrants that arrived in the U.S. in 1991. Simon said that there were about 600,00 to 750,000 admitted in that year (457). Simon also states where he got these numbers. On the other hand, in Stein’s essay he claims there were over 1,800,000 immigrants admitted to the U.S. in 1991(469). Not only was that number more than two times the number Simon gave, but also Stein does not even explain where or how he got the numbers, which makes his facts less effective. Another point, that would make Simon’s essay more effective would be the statements that he makes in letting the audience know of the ways the natives can benefit by admitting a certain number of immigrants in. Not only is he just stating the reasons, he is explaining them in detail and using examples to make them more convincing to the reader. One statement Simon’ makes is that immigration would actually save the native money: The tax and welfare data together indicate that, on balance, an immigrant famil...

5 Ways To Quit Panicking Before a Big Interview

5 Ways To Quit Panicking Before a Big Interview Interviews, especially for jobs we really want, can be incredibly nerve-wracking. Here are five ways to calm yourself down and walk in with the confidence you’ll need to land the job. Turn the voices offYour brain is probably playing a loop of what-ifs. Those have to stop. There are plenty of things you won’t be able to control, and there’s no use worrying about those. And there’s no sense worrying about the things you can control- try controlling them instead. Give yourself periodic reality checks and make sure you’re not spinning too far off into a fear spiral.Find your power placeYou’ll perform best when you feel at your best. That means being relaxed, confident, and tapped into what it is that makes you special. Figure out before the interview how to channel this feeling, and practice conjuring it up. That way, even when you’re in the hot seat, you’ll be able to access it and get into your groove.BreatheAs silly as it sounds , remind yourself to breathe. Nerves are a physiological response and your reaction to them can exacerbate the panic cycle. A few deep breaths can calm your autonomic nervous system enough for you to get back on track.Embrace rejectionFearing it won’t help you avoid it. Rejection is more common than not. The sooner you come to peace with getting a few â€Å"no’s for every ‘yes,† the better. Instead of feeling the shame, try embracing the positive: you tried, you may have failed, but you probably learned something worthwhile that will help you next time.See the personIt’s easy to view your interviewer as a robot or a super-villain holding the keys to your future and stingily not letting you in. But hiring managers are people too. They’d be delighted if you were the last person they ever had to interview. So connect on a human level, do your best, and remember: you’re just two people having a conversation.After enough interviews and buil ding this new calm and confidence, you might start to view them as a pleasant opportunity- something to look forward to!- rather than a thing to dread.